$celestron astromaster 70az lt refractor telescope kit$

$celestron astromaster 70az lt refractor telescope kit$

I’m only here to learn the fact of this scope. To know the current retail price, visit High Point Scientific (*not an affiliate link).

$celestron astromaster 70az lt refractor telescope kit$

There’s a good chance you’re now looking at a higher cost due to Covid related disruptions. When we first reviewed Celestron TravelScope 70 back in January 2019, the price was $65. The Moon looks nice, Jupiter’s moons are visible, you can tell Saturn has rings and Venus has a phase, and a few of the brightest deep-sky objects are recognizable – provided you can stay pointed at them and don’t break your neck trying to view them with the erecting prism diagonal. And at 40x with the 10mm eyepiece, the image is fuzzy and glare-ridden. The tripod refuses to stay put when the telescope is pointed above the horizon, and it constantly tips downward or upward unless the altitude axis is locked, which then prevents any sort of fine pointing. The tripod is stable enough when pointed horizontally, and the optics are sharp enough with the low-power eyepiece for the views to be of some value, and aiming the telescope by sighting down the tube works well enough.Īstronomical use is a different story. It would be okay for use at a shooting range or for casual birding. What can you see with the Celestron Travelscope 70?Īs a spotting scope, the Celestron TravelScope 70 works. The Orion FunScope is another option for a bit lower of a price, but without the high-quality optics of the 100mm tabletop telescopes it’s a bit harder for us to recommend.The Zhumell Z100 and Orion SkyScanner provide significantly more aperture than the TravelScope 70, with brighter, sharper views and rock-solid, easy-to-aim mountings.There are a few decent telescopes available at similar prices to the TravelScope 70: With the legs extended, the tripod has the stability of a wet noodle and vibrates noticeably to the untrained eye, producing distractingly shaky images at even the lowest magnifications. With the legs fully retracted (and thus only suitable for use on a table), it’s not the steadiest. It suffers from balance problems depending on where the scope is pointed at altitude, but the more serious problem is just how undersized it is. The tripod for the Travelscope 70 is little more than a dinky, mostly plastic camera tripod sold for small digital cameras and the like-hardly a mount fitting for a true astronomical telescope. The 20mm Kellner provides a little too much power for the scope for low-power sweeping, while the 10mm, though decent in quality, provides too much magnification for the scope’s poor-quality optics. However, the choices in focal lengths were poor on Celestron’s part. The construction of both is largely metal, the field of view is decent and the images reasonably sharp, although not as good as a decent Plossl or wide-field eyepiece. The Travelscope 70 comes with 20mm and 10mm Kellner eyepieces, providing 20x and 40x, respectively. The entire body and housing is plastic, as is the barrel for inserting it into the focuser drawtube. The included 45-degree erecting diagonal is not only uncomfortable to use for an astronomical telescope but also extremely low in quality. Not only is the finder useless, but it’s also completely pointless, as the scope’s wide field at low power means it doesn’t really even need a finder. It is less effective than those toy pirate telescopes made for little kids. These 5x24s have a singlet(!) plastic objective lens, an aperture stop to control the resulting aberrations that make the image unusably dim, and an eyepiece with a drinking-straw-like field of view.

$celestron astromaster 70az lt refractor telescope kit$

Celestron astromaster 70az lt refractor telescope kit